REGISTER NEW USERLOST PASSWORD? WELCOME, Logout
Classical Corner Featured — 12 June 2013

By

The Funny Parts

Yes, classical music can be funny. This may come as a shock to many, including longtime fans of the genre. We’re brought up to believe just the opposite—that “classical” is synonymous with “serious,” and with “good,” “artistic,” and “boring.”

But that’s not really the case (although the world might be a better place if more of us could embrace our Inner Bore). We can easily find music within the classical realm that is lighthearted, or witty, or crudely satirical, or coquettish, or devious, or any number of other subcategories of funny. We’re going to explore some of them here.

Years ago, when I lectured on Humor in Music to undergraduates, I prepared by reading the Encyclopedia Britannica article on humor. Britannica’s explanation is fairly long, and not that amusing. So I’m going to skip most of the background stuff. Suffice it to say that musical humor operates mainly by setting up a context that produces certain expectations—which it then nimbly defeats. We get the rug pulled out from under our feet. Listeners fall flat on their mental keisters, because they didn’t see the banana peel. Of course, because they’re merely engaging in a fantasy narrative via certain musical sounds, no bones are broken. It’s just funny.

This is the essence of what is more accurately called wit, in which the calculated inducement of surprise is the key. The humorist constructs a narrative, but its expected climax never comes. Instead, the punch line cuts across the story’s logical development. It throws us into another context, which renders pointless whatever emotional tension we’ve invested in the story. So we laugh, or at least we smile.

Wit is important, but it’s only half the story. The other half would be parody, which sets out to mock something familiar. By exaggerating certain qualities of that familiar object, parody forces us to view it in a new, presumably harsher light. And that can be very funny. Below, we’ll look at both techniques.

bezuidenhout

Part One: Wit. The defeat of the listener’s expectations is so common a feature of music in the Viennese Classical Era (roughly 1740 to 1800) that it would be easy to classify virtually all of Mozart’s and Haydn’s music as humorous. Yet that would be wrong. M. & H. do expect you to arrive on-scene with some expectations about what you’re going to hear: for example, the first movement of an instrumental work will probably proceed in sonata-allegro form, with an exposition that encompasses first theme, transition, second theme, and possible closing theme. Then on to the development, and so forth. But composers typically introduce mildly dissociative elements that freshen the formula and keep you slightly off-balance, i.e., engaged!

Here is a Mozart first movement that shows how your expectations can be exploited. You’re going to hear the following: (1) a graceful, “singing” first theme, in two-and-a-half phrases ending in a perfect cadence, followed by (2) a more rhythmic minuet-like tune, also in two phrases, the second an ornamented version of the first, ending in another perfect cadence. Then, (3) another cadence, a very brief pause, and yet another cadence. What’s going on? It’s simple and yet it’s not. Mozart is telling us that the first theme is over—hence the extra cadences. But the act of introducing not one but two extra cadences also increases the tension at this point. Part of your brain may be getting impatient: how long is this little game going to continue? It’s like having a guest at your party who has announced his departure and now lingers by the door, offering farewell gestures but showing no sign of actually going home.

Then, bang. Without breaking the rhythm of the preceding cadences, Mozart shoves us into D minor, forte, and a breathlessly quick transition theme that injects drama, energy, and menace into what had been a gracefully conventional opening gambit. And all of this happens in the first 30 seconds of the first movement.

Audio clip: Adobe Flash Player (version 9 or above) is required to play this audio clip. Download the latest version here. You also need to have JavaScript enabled in your browser.

But does it qualify as wit? Probably not. For one thing, Mozart doesn’t exaggerate anything; he doesn’t insert, say, four extra cadences, which would too obviously increase the tension and create a more palpable rift in the musical flow. For another, what came before (the first-theme complex) and what follows (the transition and then second theme) pretty much abide by the cookbook rules. We’re not being messed with—much—except for that tiny bit of tension at the end of the first theme. And that is par for the course. It’s everywhere in Mozart: if you’re a sensitive listener, you’ll pick up on his avoiding the cadence, prolonging the action, dozens of times in the course of a concerto movement or a symphony. It’s what he does.

opus 33

To get closer to wit, we could turn to Haydn, who created overtly witty movements in a number of his works. I’m going to start with one of his most obvious jokes. This is the famous String Quartet, op. 33 no. 2, actually nicknamed “The Joke.” Here is the first minute of the final movement, as played by the London Haydn Quartet in their excellent new Hyperion release:

Audio clip: Adobe Flash Player (version 9 or above) is required to play this audio clip. Download the latest version here. You also need to have JavaScript enabled in your browser.

You now have everything you need in order to get the joke, which plays out in the last minute of the movement. Hint: it hinges on the fact that both the first phrase and last phrase of the main theme end on a perfect authentic cadence, and hence could provide the ending. Here’s the last minute:

Audio clip: Adobe Flash Player (version 9 or above) is required to play this audio clip. Download the latest version here. You also need to have JavaScript enabled in your browser.

Now let’s consider some slightly more complicated funny parts in Haydn. One of my favorites is the minuet from his Symphony No. 104, “London.” Since he was more or less obliged to put a minuet in virtually every multi-movement work he wrote, Haydn once said that he wished he could create just one truly original minuet. To judge from this one, though, he could turn out an original minuet and barely break a sweat. Listen:

Audio clip: Adobe Flash Player (version 9 or above) is required to play this audio clip. Download the latest version here. You also need to have JavaScript enabled in your browser.

Okay, I did say this one was more complicated. Let’s begin with the rhythms. A minuet typically comes in one metric flavor: three beats to a bar. You will have noticed that in nearly every bar of this minuet, Haydn accents the third beat. It would ordinarily be the weakest beat in the measure, but not here. Close to the end of the first period (at 0:07 and 0:16, because it repeats), he emphasizes that third beat further by using it to start a big leap downward to the penultimate note in the tune. In the contrasting section that follows, Haydn starts banging out a series of equally accented beats, and our comfortable triple-meter dance gets lost entirely in duple (one-two-one-two) for a few moments. Then (at 0:29) the music regains its metric footing, and a harmonic buildup leads to the return of the first-period material.

When that leads, as we expected it would, to the end of the section, we get the punch line. At the big leap downward (about 0:48), Haydn pauses. Instead of completing the leap, we get . . . nothing. This disorienting grand pause can’t last forever, of course. (That would be so 20th-century.) A moment later the music resumes speed, and the “A” section of the minuet safely ends.

Hamelin Haydn

Ready for more? Here’s a Haydn piano sonata finale that actually creates a comic protagonist. At least, if the material is handled sensitively, we begin to react with amusement to the predicament Haydn has created for his hero. Listen:

Audio clip: Adobe Flash Player (version 9 or above) is required to play this audio clip. Download the latest version here. You also need to have JavaScript enabled in your browser.

This is a frustration joke. It’s not unlike watching a wind-up toy blithely chug into a wall and then spin its wheels vainly, unable to escape. Except that, of course, the music does have to go on, and it does. We were listening to Marc-André Hamelin, from volume one of his superlative recent Haydn sonata series for Hyperion. I am collecting these, and I found Hamelin’s way with this sonata delightfully packed with energy, clarity, and sunlight.

But listen now to an Old Master, Alfred Brendel, interpreting the same sonata:

Audio clip: Adobe Flash Player (version 9 or above) is required to play this audio clip. Download the latest version here. You also need to have JavaScript enabled in your browser.

By making slightly more obvious tempo changes—not indicated in the score but well within the expressive boundaries for 18th-century keyboard works—Brendel allows us to savor the comedy even more than Hamelin. His protagonist doesn’t recover and get on with it quite as quickly. If you have ever marveled at how Keaton or Chaplin could use a small gesture, a slightly cocked head or raised eyebrow, to take us inside their characters, then you will appreciate what a master pianist can achieve here.

Here’s a kind of graduation exercise: the final movement of Haydn’s Symphony No. 88. It’s a sonata-rondo with some subtle wit of the type we’ve explored above. You’ll easily catch the delayed-denouement, or “other shoe” tease, that occurs during retransitions to the main theme. But see if you catch the noisy iteration of that same motive in the horns as the coda drives us onward, crudely but merrily, into the very end of the work. (Pay no attention to the conductor. He’s just grandstanding.)

Part Two: Parody. If wit is the humorist’s rapier, then parody is his blunt instrument. Whether it’s Mad Magazine or Jonathan Swift’s “Modest Proposal,” parody relies mainly on broad brushwork. That means anyone can give it a go, and nearly anyone can enjoy it. Even if you don’t know the original, you will probably appreciate that someone is knocking the stuffing out of it. Or at least acting wild and crazy while referencing something ostensibly profound, dignified, “serious,” and so forth. Hence the perennial appeal of Spike Jones and His City Slickers. More recently, Peter Schickele used the fictional P.D.Q. Bach to skewer the pretensions of Baroque music and its supporters.

Mozart excelled at dramatic humor; there are comic moments in his operas that never lose their appeal. (I’ll devote another column to those someday.) Other than in his operas, though, he didn’t explore wit nearly as often as Haydn. What he did leave us was one of the classic examples of parody in all classical music: the Musical Joke, K. 522. It’s not witty. It’s just bad. The music is full of senseless repetition, clumsy and inept attempts at tunes and accompaniments, awkward transitions, and more. You couldn’t ask for worse examples of the Classical style. Well, you could, but there’s a point at which such things just become pathetic. It’s more amusing to behold the deadly combination of can-do enthusiasm and lamebrain results that Mozart gives us.

To make things worse, the players also have their weak moments. You’ll hear some of that beginning at 5:38 in the YouTube video below. It’s revealing that Mozart waits until the second movement to bring in the humor of poor performance technique; clearly he considers poor composing the original sin!

Time for a little Britannica: Clearly, there’s one human impulse common to all humor but especially to parody, and that is aggression. It may surface as malice, contempt, condescension, or just an absence of sympathy for the “victim.” In that sense, humor is cruel, and cruelty is essential. If you replace aggression with compassion, the joke is lost. Aristotle and Cicero both noted the relationship of the comic to the ugly, base, or deformed. In primitive cultures, cruelty and boastful self-assertion are almost always present in jokes, as they are with children’s teasing. Perhaps in this way the joker conquers his or her fear of suffering or injustice and emerges unscathed by a perceived threat.

Thus humor can be a way to work off uncomfortable emotions. That would certainly explain the prevalence of satire and parody in 20th-century music, especially when it pops up in the work of, say, Mahler, or Shostakovich.

Here I am tempted to launch into a discussion of the slow movement in Mahler’s First Symphony, which is parodic and satirical on many levels. It treats a children’s nursery song, Frère Jacques, as a slow funeral march in a minor key. That is followed by a mournful, vaguely “Jewish” melody rudely shoved aside by a cheap marching tune scored as if for klezmer band. (In the YouTube video below, the slow movement begins at 25:08, with the Jewish and klezmer tunes intruding at 27:23.)

Yet the effect is hardly comic. We feel too directly Mahler’s own emotional involvement, his intent to register a personal reference, to take any of this lightly. We experience it as pathos (certainly) and irony (probably), but not as comedy.

For parody as comedy, we can turn to Shostakovich, whose Ninth Symphony aggressively pokes holes in his audience’s expectations, but with a smile. Ever since Beethoven’s time, any Symphony No. 9 that came along was destined to signal “Milestone!” or “Big Statement!” in people’s minds. A ninth symphony was automatically assumed to be the work in which a mature, distinguished composer would issue Deep Thoughts and Valedictory Remarks. Then he was expected to exercise further good taste by dying.

Shostakovich wasn’t having any of that. Instead, he came up with a playful, relatively brief work. “Musicians will love to play it,” he said, “and critics will delight in attacking it.” He was right on both counts. Soon after the work’s 1945 premiere, some Soviet critics found fault with its “ideological weaknesses.” It had utterly failed “to reflect the true spirit of the Soviet people.”

This obviously didn’t come as a surprise to its composer. You can almost hear him anticipating those critics in the first movement, whose merry goings-on are eventually put down by flatulent blasts from a trombone:

Audio clip: Adobe Flash Player (version 9 or above) is required to play this audio clip. Download the latest version here. You also need to have JavaScript enabled in your browser.

Did you notice how the music changed course after that first trombone entrance? The sprightly, freely wandering tune gave way to a crisp quickstep that, bit by bit, took over the proceedings and grew in strength. Maybe Shostakovich used this parody of military musical style to suggest the chilling effect of official criticism on artists. Or maybe not—his light touch allowed for multiple interpretations. It also allowed him to dodge the repercussions that a more pointed musical message would have provoked.

By the way, that was Vasily Petrenko and the Royal Liverpool Philharmonic Orchestra, from their ongoing, extremely successful Shostakovich series for Naxos. I’ve raved about it in this space before, so ‘nuff said! You need to get the whole set. (There’s a Bernstein recording—of course—in which that trombone comes on with even greater vulgarity, but I think Petrenko gets the job done.)

trombone joke

Not A Bit Funny, But: And so we come to the end of our Discourse on Musical Humor. For those who remain unconvinced about the value of the funny parts, I am attaching a couple of pocket reviews that will provide you too with a takeaway. Exhibit A: Ondine’s magnificent Rachmaninoff All-Night Vigil, featuring the Latvian Radio Choir (ODE 1206-5; SACD). These are the same singers who did such wonderful work for Gavin Bryars’ On Photography, one of my all-time favorite choral discs (GB Records BCGBCD07). Here they apply their faultless intonation, blend, and dynamic control to one of the undisputed masterpieces of the Russian Orthodox liturgy. It’s not their technical perfection that carries the day, however. It’s their earnestly expressive delivery. Recorded in St. John’s Church, Riga, this disc will effortlessly propel you into the world of Orthodox devotion. Recommended without reservation.

Audio clip: Adobe Flash Player (version 9 or above) is required to play this audio clip. Download the latest version here. You also need to have JavaScript enabled in your browser.

all-night-vigil

Exhibit B: La Voie Triomphale, from the Staff Band of the Norwegian Armed Forces (2L 86, SACD & Blu-ray). I realize this disc has been lauded already in our big audio magazines, but I wanted to add my two cents. Everything you’ve read is true: the music (from Berlioz, Saint-Saëns, Dukas, Milhaud, Tomasi, and Bozza) is expertly played and recorded equally well. If you like band music, you will love this. Oddly enough, its chief virtue and only fault are one and the same: precision. Does your heart leap up when you remember your old drill sergeant, the guy who could bounce a quarter off your exquisitely-made barracks bed and reward you with a tight little smile? Kid, this disc is for you.

Audio clip: Adobe Flash Player (version 9 or above) is required to play this audio clip. Download the latest version here. You also need to have JavaScript enabled in your browser.

Featured image: “PDQ Bach on the Air,” an early effort from the inimitable musical humorist Peter Schickele. Courtesy Vanguard Records.

Next month: Best of Spring 2013 and a Verdi Update

staff_band_norwegian

Forward to a friend and help us engage more readers Forward to a friend and help us engage more readers

Get new and fresh stories like this each morning by joining the folks reading Paul's Posts. Click here

Related Articles

Share

About Author

Lawrence Schenbeck

Lawrence Schenbeck lives in Atlanta Georgia, is into high-end and has a doctorate in music performance and literature. "I have spent most of my grownup years either teaching, conducting, or writing about music. A lot of that writing was directed at other professionals, but some was meant for civilians. I always tried not to sound pompous (that was hard) and not to condescend to my readers. Back in the days when I gave pre-concert lectures for the Atlanta Symphony, I would invariably meet audience members whose knowledge of concert music far exceeded mine in certain respects. Whether you're casually exploring classical music or passionately committed to it, I hope this column will be useful."

(5) Readers Comments

  1. For better or worse, I was introduced into the world of classical music through the deftly mangled work of the notorious P.D.Q. Bach. My ears will never be the same.

    • You really summed up his appeal well — DEFTLY mangled! If Schickele hadn’t been so good at it, he wouldn’t have been nearly as funny. It helped that people could perceive the skill behind the wackiness. I understand that he has cut his PDQ activity way back in recent years, largely because audiences no longer had the background to get many of the jokes. (Of course, he may also be getting too old to swing down from the balcony on a rope, which was his customary way of appearing onstage….) Great memories.

  2. Lawrence you are right about some classical music being funny but I don’t agree with your choices. I guess funny is in the ear of the beholder. Of all of Haydn the only one I can think of off hand that I know that strikes me as funny is the Surprise Symphony which as I recall was intended to alternately lull aristocrats who were its typical audience of the day to sleep and then jar them awake.

    Delibes Slavic theme and variations from Coppelia has one variation where the orchestra seems to be laughing. That part comes at about 5:30 in the link below which BTW IMO is too slow (Karajan’s version is over a minute shorter.)

    http://ie.ex.fm/song/678g0/Slavonic+Theme+and+Variations-Léo+Delibes

    Richard Strauss’ Merry Pranks of Til Eulenspeigel was supposed to be funny, I don’t think I ever quite got it. While the pranks may have been funny I didn’t find the music tickled my funny bone at all. BTW as I recall he gets hanged in the end, maybe that’s the funny part.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S7O9Oa22nsQ

    There are some very funny scenes in the 1st, 2nd, and 4th act of La Boheme. Seeing Musetta’s part in the Second Act is a scream from beginning to end. Anna Moffo played it to the hilt for all it’s worth in the Metropolitan Opera Version on DG video (highly recommended.)

    I recall Victor Borge’s funny concerts on TV decades ago and Danny Kaye did a very funny skit conducting the New York Philharmonic.

    Finally I recall that Seymour DeKoven who broadcast in NYC on WFUV many years ago was a proponent of PDQ Bach.

    If I think of any others I’ll post them.

  3. Is the Sorcerer’s Apprentice a funny piece of music by itself? It didn’t strike me that way. But when Disney applied his genius to it, it became an entirely different matter. Perhaps music can accentuate the humor in something that is already funny or make it funny.

  4. Hi Soundminded, thanks for the comments and suggestions. I listened to the Delibes but fell asleep (smile) before 5:30 came along, so I can’t say whether I agree or not about it being funny. I personally find that a lot of intentional merriment in classical music fails to come off — unless you are a born wit, accustomed to cracking wise and gauging your audience well, you will probably not manage “humor” very well.

    Again I turn to Haydn for an example. In “The Seasons,” which he wrote toward the end of his life and essentially under pressure from his librettist and patron Baron von Swieten, he offers a scene from “Winter” in which people gather around a cozy fire inside and listen to an old woman tell stories. (I may have a few details wrong, it’s been a while). Here’s the deal, though: at regular intervals the chorus has to laugh uproariously at her story.

    Well, there is nothing worse than trying to write out laughter, to judge from the results in that scene. It falls flatter than a pancake. An embarrassingly bad moment, although again I stress this is only my personal observation.

    But yeah, I don’t think “Til Eulenspiegel” is funny either. It’s a skillful German attempt at PORTRAYING a merry scamp, but funny? Where’s the element of surprise? (As far as I’m concerned, if there’s no surprise, there’s no fun.)

    Incidentally, when Haydn wrote the “Surprise” Symphony, he was intentionally putting in what he called “audience elements” for the middle-class crowds who flocked to his London concerts in the 1790s. He thought they should get something amusing or novel in the course of the evening, since they were not necessarily connoisseurs. But that is definitely a funny moment. And the reason? Surprise!

    Some wag once said that comedy is whatever happens to you, whereas if it happens to me, it’s tragedy. In that regard, I suppose seeing some other poor clod’s nightmare — e.g., “The Sorcerer’s Apprentice” — is comedy. If you or I actually had a day at the office like that, it wouldn’t end as well, and we’d probably label it tragic.

Leave a Reply