Is anyone making money?
The music industry has been turned upside down by a lot of factors (see How Wall Street destroyed the music industry) including the internet. No longer do musicians and bands make anywhere near the money they used to selling their music in the traditional way: getting an agent, a label, a break and the rest is history. So while things are undergoing massive change it is instructive to take a look at what might become the new paradigm for many artists.
To uncover this new paradigm and get a hint to the direction the industry is most likely taking, we need to look closely at one of the key elements that turned the industry upside down in the first place: the internet itself. A growing volume of independent music is now distributed through downloads and independent “labels” that pop up like weeds, giving new artists (and even established artists) a new vehicle to reach music lovers all over the world.
This model is very different than what might come to mind when you think downloads. Downloads to many mean iTunes, Amazon Music, or in the high-end, sites like HD Tracks where certainly a ton of music is downloaded. The independent label downloaded music model is just one of the fascinating new ways artists all over the world can reach their audiences. It really doesn’t take much more than a website and a home recording studio and, a lot of talent.
This new paradigm of music distribution places the entire challenge of reaching the audience back in the hands of the artists themselves. Each artist can now create, market, distribute and make a healthy living from doing so – if they have the talent needed to attract a strong following. The new model, in the right hands, can provide high resolution media that is fresh, new, alive and not beholden to the economic restrictions the big labels typically place on their stable of talent.
A great example of this new paradigm in music distribution is exemplified by Jonathan Coulton. You can view his website at http://www.jonathancoulton.com Known mostly for clever and perhaps a bit goofy music, Coulton just happens to make over $500,000 a year with essentially no overhead, no managers, no touring and enjoys the freedom of making music the way he wants to, hand crafted to his standards. This is independence at its best and reminds us of all the great independent high-end audio manufacturers that started out in the garage.
Coulton, like many independent entrepreneurs, “fell into” what he’s doing, but now spends his entire life’s energy making music and a good living at it. From the website:
“In 2005 I left my day job writing software to pursue music full time. To keep myself busy I released a new song on this website every week for a year in a project called Thing a Week. A few of those songs became big internet hits (my folky cover of Sir Mix-a-Lot’s “Baby Got Back“, a funny video called “Flickr“, a song called “Code Monkey“), and I am now fortunate enough to make my living as a musician. I write about a lot of geeky stuff because I am a geek. Some of it’s funny, but a lot of it’s not so funny, and even more of it is somewhere in between. I’ve been compared to They Might Be Giants, Barenaked Ladies, Loudon Wainwright III, and other musicians you REALLY LOVE. I give lots of music away because I believe it helps my cause, and I love it when people use my music to create other stuff – music videos, pictures, remixes, etc. At the moment I’m unsigned, and I’m proud to say I’ve created this whole thing mostly on my own (with plenty of help from an amazingly supportive bunch of fans). But it certainly is getting busy…I will probably sell out and go Hollywood any day now…”How does his model work? It’s actually pretty simple. Through his website, among other distribution platforms, Coulton sells his tracks for $1.00 each. A buck isn’t much, but when you distribute unique hand crafted work over a large enough web, the results can be amazing. Our hats are off to Jonathan Coulton, a great example of figuring out what works in the new order and leading the path for future musicians to make a living doing what they love most, making music.
Forward to a friend and help us engage more readers
Recent Comments
Paul McGowan: True – which is ne of the reasons we use complimentary symmetry designs instead – but...
hahax: But in a sense in your single ended example there is no real middle. In a single ended topology if you now...
Soundminded: So that others can find it on the internet, read it for themselves and make up their own minds about...
Tom Devey: Why would you mention the individual’s name in a post, which I believe you have done on at least...
Soundminded: I’ve heard this assertion for the longest time and I must say I can’t make heads or tails...
Paul McGowan: Now there’s a big question. I’d need a lot more physics to explain as I only have a hazy...
Tom Devey: In the early days of radio, no one individual did more to develop and commercialize radio than Marconi....
Dan Schwartz: So how DO crystals work?
Paul McGowan: I am with you about Tesla – and the Edison Tesla wars – my whole video from Coal To...
Gannon: I haven’t read through the whole thing yet, but since it IS history…can we get it right?...
Paul McGowan: The bias you are asking about sets the center point of the tube. So imagine a 0 to 100 scale going...
Paul McGowan: Thanks!
woot: Hello Paul- I just wanted to asay that I’m really digging this series. Woot
Steve Parry: Another great post helping me visualize what these devices are doing! In your tube example is the DC...
Paul McGowan: Yes they do, but I am not sure it is the root cause. As you are well aware, there are also benefits...
Terry Franklin: For starters, yes!
Soundminded: Isn’t Kansas where the legislature wants teachers to teach the bible’s version of...
Terry Franklin: …critical thinking is becoming a casualty and all ideas no matter how preposterous must be given...
Soundminded: Why do discrete transistors sound different (better?) than IC op amps? Here are two ideas that are...
Soundminded: There are crystals and there are crystals. Let a bowl of sea water evaporate and what you’re...
Paul McGowan: I’ll be on his other side.
Terry Franklin: If there is a test at the end of this course, may I be seated next to Soundminded?
Tom Devey: The man credited with the invention of the Cathode Ray Tube is Karl Ferdinand Braun in 1897.
Paul McGowan: You’re welcome!
Soundminded: A minor point. It’s that it’s a small CHANGE in the cathode to control grid voltage that...
Joseph Hanz: Plain and simple Thanx Sir Paul!
russ_l: Not much later on Deforest made maximum use of a vacuum; namely the invention of the cathode ray tube...
Larry Ho: Hi, Paul & Bill Thanks for the tips. Will let them update Light Harmonic web site. As a long time...
billleebens: Time to update their website! Thanks for the props, Paul! And happy birthday!
Ladderman: Lorne, I’m with you. My system is 3 way tri amp – S/S for subs and bass mid to 500hz and...