After Thomas Edison figured out how to mass produce the light bulb and keep it affordable his next task was to figure out how to get it accepted into people’s homes. Edison’s brilliance lay in his uncanny ability as a marketer and practical applications engineer and he’s known today as a true genius because of the society changing concepts he implemented – they were nothing short of profound.
In those days light in the home was created with fire: gas lanterns and candles being the predominant means of lighting. The infrastructure for gas lighting in cities was extensive and run by powerful companies who had no intention of letting some upstart like Edison ruin their business with a light that did not need gas – but we all know how that turned out in the end.
Edison was a clever tinkerer and a master at leveraging existing technology to his advantage. With the financial help of JP Morgan and the Vanderbilts, Edison began building his infrastructure to light up homes in New York at a price competitive with gas lanterns. The streets of New York were torn up and underground wiring was installed to feed the larger buildings with power that would operate light bulbs.
Power was generated by large dynamos driven by steam engines and coal. The dynamos were big versions of the same kind of generator you might have used to power the light on your bicycle – you know, the one that rubbed against the bike’s tire. The business started slowly but soon started to take off and gain in popularity.
Homes were first because the wealthy home owners were eager for something new and interesting as well they were concerned about the ever present danger of fire and the smell of the gas lanterns – a problem that the new light bulb didn’t have at all. But soon a problem cropped up that was unanticipated. As more homes were added the amount of light coming from the bulbs began to grow dimmer and those who found themselves the furthest from the generating stations had much lower light output than those of their uptown neighbors.
To make matters worse tall buildings, of which there are many in New York City, had the same problem as did the neighbors: rooms at the top of the building were noticeably dimmer than those at the bottom. Businesses were excited to use the Edison light bulb in their office buildings but acceptance was limited due to the variability of the light output.
To solve the problem Edison built more generating stations which helped the neighborhood problem but nothing he did could tackle the tall building problem.
What was the fundamental issue? Edison was using DC to power his bulbs. DC, or battery voltage, delivers exactly what the bulbs wanted but the amount of DC voltage was what controlled the brightness of each bulb and this is where we get in trouble.
Tomorrow, the problem with DC.
Forward to a friend and help us engage more readersYou must be logged in to post a comment.
Soundminded
The problem of voltage drop between the power source and the load as a function of the varying size of the load is a problem in all electrical systems, AC, DC, the largest utility networks, building power distribution systems, and electronic systems at the signal level and at the power supply level. And it has only gotten worse and more complex. It is the job of the electrical design engineer to define acceptable voltage drop limits within defined system operating parameters and devise and impliment engineering strategies to deal with it. For anyone imagining that the perfect electrical system where this doesn’t happen (superconducting systems in laboratories excluded) they’re dreaming. Things don’t work that way. In audio systems it’s a matter of affecting performance. In larger networks that deal with substantial power the consequences include equipment that won’t function properly, damage to equipment, collapse of the network, and in some cases even severe injury due to electrocution. The problem of harmonics induced by switching mode power supplies that are commonly used in most electronic data processing equipment, much other equipment, and in fluorescent lamp ballasts has made the problem even worse in recent decades. While the applications all seem different and to the untrained eye they seem disconnected, they all stem from the same basic principles of electicity, only the details are different. The solutions must address the details of the cause in each specific instance.